This is my brother's take on peer review. I have talked to scientists who have appreciated some of their peer reviews, and say they improved the paper, but I strongly suspect that, in the main, Aaron is correct.https://twitter.com/ahaspel/status/1404850613574328325 …
Potentially, but even if it is in theory possible the layers of beaurocracy make it understandably hard to do. Public health data is incredibly well protected in most places (for good reason)
-
-
I think a bureaucracy problem is a very different problem from a security problem. If we're going to make data-sharing the norm, we're obviously going to need new rules and procedures. But I think that's what we should work toward.
-
I'm not sure I agree in this context. Datasets in public health are mostly collected from people who do not explicitly consent to research and the data is used under very strict conditions - it's a big ask to share that regardless of the context
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.