This is my brother's take on peer review. I have talked to scientists who have appreciated some of their peer reviews, and say they improved the paper, but I strongly suspect that, in the main, Aaron is correct.https://twitter.com/ahaspel/status/1404850613574328325 …
Pretty much any large public health database will have that information, whether or not every field is used in the study
-
-
But if you don't use every field, you can just make public the ones you use, yes?
-
Potentially, but even if it is in theory possible the layers of beaurocracy make it understandably hard to do. Public health data is incredibly well protected in most places (for good reason)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.