My challenge with the lab leak hypothesis is that much of the "evidence" presented in the media simply isn't evidence of any kind. We're just relitigating the same arguments from February 2020 with new headlines
Lol, that's a different story to the one I read but also gives you an idea of how wildly different the scenarios you're imagining are. That's not a lab leak so much as a manufacturing error
-
-
I would agree that factories often make mistakes, however these rarely (never?) result in novel pathogens as far as I'm aware
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let's review: - Dr Dazak stated that infection experiments w humanized mice had highest risk of spillover. - WIV performed such experiments. Dr. Shi's first thought was that the virus was from her lab at WIV - We've seen 6 seperate sars escapes since early 2000s.
-
- Shi's team has created novel chimeric covs based on batcovs & tested them for infectivity in human cells. She has lied about performing work on RaTG13, the cov that is most closely related (96.2% similar) to cov2 - Directors of WHO and NIH call for lab leak to be srsly explored
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.