With the publication of the Science letter, the Overton window for discussion of "lab leak" hypothesis has shifted dramatically. We now have mainstream scientific opinions that largely range between "lab leak can be dismissed" and "both zoonosis and lab leak are viable". 1/8
Why would we expect there to be evidence of prior batcovs in the serological samples published so far from Wuhan? Which samples are you talking about here? How do they differ from the samples taken for SARS and MERS?
-
-
Maybe you need to review the topic. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435492/ …pic.twitter.com/fnA9XO1zNz
-
Re: "Maybe you need to review the topic." ...says the non-expert with no pertinent knowledge of immunology, epidemiology, etc. https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/891040491214688257 … https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-convened-global-study-of-origins-of-sars-cov-2-china-part-annexes.pdf?sfvrsn=3065bcd8_5 …pic.twitter.com/ru8xBG3LsD
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.