With the publication of the Science letter, the Overton window for discussion of "lab leak" hypothesis has shifted dramatically. We now have mainstream scientific opinions that largely range between "lab leak can be dismissed" and "both zoonosis and lab leak are viable". 1/8
-
-
A sample is not the same thing as a natural reservoir. Once again, there is zero serological evidence in wuhan of any prior exposure to batcovs. That's highly unusual for natural zoonoses if we compare that exs such as cov1 and mers.
-
Why would we expect there to be evidence of prior batcovs in the serological samples published so far from Wuhan? Which samples are you talking about here? How do they differ from the samples taken for SARS and MERS?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.