Q: why did Andersen just delete 5000 tweets ?
A: He’s already been caught lying on his rebuttals. His web of lies are unraveling
The smart ones like Ralph Baric already headed for the door
Collaborators that go down with the ship will eventually be scorned and defunded 
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @K_G_Andersen @MackayIM and
This is a bold-face lie. By what metric are they auto-deleted? We were able to find many tweets last week regarding your acknowledgment of RaTG13 before the 31st.
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @tehknein @K_G_Andersen and
Well said, there is no way he has it set to auto-delete after n period of time elapses. It's clear Hans has bulk-deleted his tweets himself. The thing about weaving webs of lies is eventually they trap you.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @xnewyorkie @PrometheusAM and
Happy now? One fewer Scientist to add reality and to rebut the fever dreams, misinformation & conspiracies of bored couch experts? I hope Kristian comes back. His communication skills were among the best of the actual working scientists on here.
7 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @MackayIM @xnewyorkie and
People aren't really interested in science or facts these days, it's more about the preferred narrative sadly
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Ironically, neither are Mackay, Andersen and co... They've obfuscated and resisted an inquiry into the lab origin hypothesis the whole pandemic. Science as a process requires the scrutiny of testing and observation, not experts pontificating on what they believe to be true.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @PrometheusAM @GidMK and
PS claiming to have a monopoly of facts whilst telling serious, scientifically literate people that a lab origin was not plausible, parroting CCP propaganda and conducting a conflicted ruse of an origins investing doesn't demonstrate a commitment to science or facts either!
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
Lol, what a silly straw man. My thoughts on the subject are rather public, and none of that is even remotely true about either of the profs you're insultinghttps://link.medium.com/WF4l6FBDSgb
-
-
You mean Andersen who publicly smeared Alina Chan and various scientists who endorsed the plausibility of lab origins, whilst privately having the same reservations? That's some revisionist history. I guess it helps his emails are deleted.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.