Thank you.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But all this talk about the origin of COVID is just thinly veiled racism at work. This is similar to the origins of HIV being used by many to attack Africans.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In a way, I agree to you but there is no harm to have proper investigation. If scientists are inquisitive to understand in depth about origin then they should be given chance. That's what Science is. Science does not believe on forced acceptance. This is what happening at present
-
I think it's reasonable to investigate further while acknowledging that with current evidence one explanation is far more likely than the other
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The best sentence; ‘it is entirely possible that researchers studying existing coronaviruses that were natural in origin accidentally let the virus slip out’, which is absolutely TRUE.
-
Wuhan virus lab is the leading contaminating source of the original Wuhan virus, SARS-CoV-2, attacking on the Wuhan city. Then, the entire planet. The main problem was simply low-level of biosafety, not politics.https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1399084386457473026 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was very popular once to believe that the earth was flat or that the sun and planets revolved around earth. Popular political opinion is the enemy of science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"In China the majority of primary care services are provided from hospitals, which includes things like sick certificates for people who miss a day of work due to a cold" refutes the November WIV staff theory. Their narrative: China secretive => any theory blaming China is true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You wrote: And yet, headlines are currently screaming that scientists have “proved” that Covid-19 was bioengineered in a lab despite this being no more likely than in July 2020. What’s going on?
-
That is a straw-man and cherry picking the evidence. That headline said that. What most are saying is that the lab leak theory had gained new credibility while remaining unproven. Please be more careful in the construction of your strawmen
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.