A "new study" has hit the headlines that apparently proves that SARS-CoV-2 was lab-grown I am QUITE SKEPTICAL for a number of reasons, would love your thoughts...pic.twitter.com/J9aJc1BeTq
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Everyone spent a week pushing the Overton window on lab leaks with zero evidence and now this stuff fits in it again
I'm no braniac but my understanding is that if-as they claim-the laws of physics say something is impossible there is no "unless it is manufactured" exception.
damn, all this time we could break c just as long as it was artificial?
I guess someone should let nucleoplasmin know it doesn’t obey the laws of physics (but apparently does for the laws of biochemistry)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_localization_sequence …
Lol what Dr. Kindrachuk said. Also this makes no sense at all, and let me just address the big claim that seems to come up more and more: viruses don’t automatically evolve to be more transmissible and less pathogenic. Natural evolution has many possible outcomes.
The title alone bring the credibility into doubt.
When you start working in a lab they give you this special badge that lets you break the laws of physics.
Wow, some biophysics non sense there...
I just put a string of 5 arginine into the NCBI Blast and look: There are several hits, e.g. Titin from Cricetulus griseus (from position 34667). So they didn't even take 5 minutes to check their claim? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/EGW08606.1?report=genbank&log$=protalign&blast_rank=29&RID=B5T8NE4G013 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.