There is that but some of it is not gibberish, it is too close to the truth and people are not accustomed to being told the truth and /or many can not deal with or accept the truth.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I typically recognise bots by the inability to respond in a human manner; repetitive responses that dont link or respond to a re-analysis of the original thread. Inability to interpret Rorschach images or similar too :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I normally call them sockpuppets which is difficult to deny
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's annoying, but the term has been expanded to include 'paid poster' not just AI it's not really so far off to conflate the two - in my work fairly technical people refer to Amazon MTurk-type workers as if they're automated worker processes, for example
-
Interesting. Who has expanded their definition of "social bot" to include paid posters? I was not aware of anyone doing so.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes but AI is getting so good these days it can produce gibberish that’s almost as incoherent as an actual dumb human.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems to be a mixture of bots imitating people, and people imitating bots .. Raising questions about who is passing and who is failing their Turing Test...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps we define "bot" as anything that reacts to all stimuli with predetermined responses, in the absence of intervening evaluation, reflection, consideration of alternatives, and moral compass (ie human virtues).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.