This is a bizarre take. The evidence has stayed precisely the same - natural origin very likely, lab leak thus far entirely unproven and a very low chance The rest is mostly misconceptions caused by reading only sensationalist headlineshttps://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1397160688284536842 …
Actually, there's extremely tenuous evidence that 3 workers *attended* a hospital, but in China many hospitals provide primary care services so it is also possible that these visits were simply for sick certificates or similar
-
-
Chairman Xi approves that you’re carrying the water for him here on the ole’ Twitter machine. Social credit points are in your future.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The WHO report specifically mentions no evidence of Covid-like illness in anyone associated with the lab, so this is the likely explanation. It won’t stop the conspiracy theorists from theorising, though

-
The so-called WHO investigation was rather a PR action than a true investigation. WHO chief said personally that the lab hypothesis was not given proper recognition and dozens of leading scientists called for a proper scientific investigationhttps://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.