This is a bizarre take. The evidence has stayed precisely the same - natural origin very likely, lab leak thus far entirely unproven and a very low chance The rest is mostly misconceptions caused by reading only sensationalist headlineshttps://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1397160688284536842 …
-
-
The problem is that we haven't investigated a lab leak enough to say with any certainty that it is not what happened, but that is ~not the same~ as making it more probable
Show this thread -
Some more excellent reading on the topichttps://twitter.com/MoNscience/status/1397696019933143040?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You literally are not reading the letter. You have it completely backwards. Just insane…https://twitter.com/RadCentrism/status/1397815148161638403 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@amymaxmen wrote this in@Nature, about how problematic this is becoming:https://twitter.com/amymaxmen/status/1397739281959907328 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you are confusing `referring’ to something and `endorsing’ it. `But’ doesn’t make sense in you sentence. Replacing it with `after’ might make more sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This would be the same WHO which blew its credibility over Ebola in 2014, then again at the start of last year? That WHO? It IS quite unlikely, but not nearly as unlikely as it should be, given the safety issues which were already known to exist at the WIV.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The WHO amplified PRC misinformation by claiming Covid could not be transmitted human to human. This was in January 2020 when the PRC was locking everything down because they knew it spread human to human. The WHO is a mouthpiece of the PRC, and is not to be taken seriously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I may not be a genius. I am not a Trump supporter either. Given that, isn't it possible that they were studying this virus in the Wuhan lab and it was accidentally spread from there?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Baric, et al: “WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus commented that the report's consideration of evidence supporting a laboratory accident was insufficient…we agree with the WHO director-general.”