This is a bizarre take. The evidence has stayed precisely the same - natural origin very likely, lab leak thus far entirely unproven and a very low chance The rest is mostly misconceptions caused by reading only sensationalist headlineshttps://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1397160688284536842 …
-
-
After listening to WHO investigators discuss it that really isn't the impression I got (re obstructionism):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7kRxmEgzbQ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
CCP was more obstructionist during SARS, possible there’s been a slight improvement but access to pre Nov 19 blood bank samples for serology, stored respiratory samples must be provided. WIV also released 7 novel CoV sequences a week back. Wonder if this was shared with WHO team?
-
I thought
@PaulBieniasz really set expectations correctly:pic.twitter.com/W6xt6SR5v3
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If they were going to do a cover up, they could have planted evidence of sars cov 2 in an intermediate host at the wet market. The fact that nobody has found it yet is a pretty good sign they aren’t actively cooking evidence
-
Just pulling past papers from dbs. That's all. Nothing to see, nothing to notice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Disinterested? They have been running propoganda daily.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because penalties include execution, we are often mislead into thinking authoritarian systems are accountable at least to their top. But hiding the start of even the most natural outbreak would have been the 1st instinct of local officials.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I now see that a natural origin unrelated to a lab is the most likely explanation. I read Counterpunch article & believed lab leak thesis. Andersen's latest Tweets changed my mind. Better communication from scientists can prevent much confusion. MORE
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Dazsak had explained in lay terms at the outset why a lab is an unlikely source I wouldn't have given much credence to the lab theory. His information about the virus catalog produced by WIV before the pandemic is very persuasive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.