Stumbled on this paper about a retracted vitamin D study last year, and it is a WILD RIDE This paper got 100,000s of downloads on SSRN, and changed worldwide policy It also might have been...entirely fraudulent?https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443564/ …
-
-
Also it appears that one of the authors of the investigative paper is on twitter
@RaymondPranataShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Odd response to what was a clearly fraudulent paper. The authors did not even exist. But there you are with a list of other dubious studies.
End of conversation
-
-
-
And darker skinned people no? Dr John Campbell
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hyped by the usual suspects....https://twitter.com/mattwridley/status/1259616958984499201?s=20 …
-
Viscount Matt Ridley hits again !!!! Now with the panacea of ailments: vit D. Mon dieu, true in form....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And this, right here, is the current issue with peer review. If something sounds good enough to the reviewers, and they're in ideological lockstep more and more these days, then it passes, regardless of whether or not it's actually true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.