So, this is still ongoing, but I think there's an important lesson here in how wildly problematic academic debate is as a forum during a pandemichttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1396654447791525890 …
-
-
It's fair to say that 99%+ of people who have read the study probably assume that there is no scientific issue with it, even though there are several letters pointing out problems ~published in the same journal~
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you should send them this, published in... EJCI
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/eci.13190 …pic.twitter.com/MtgGdqFkU9
-
It's actually a bit wild that they don't even link to our letter(s) at all on the page of the study. The only way to figure out that there's been some debate is to check the studies citing this one and then traipse through the citations
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.