So, this is still ongoing, but I think there's an important lesson here in how wildly problematic academic debate is as a forum during a pandemichttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1396654447791525890 …
-
-
The other issue is with attention. The initial published article has an Altmetric score of 19,000 (!). Our letter in response is 206, their response to that is 409, and our newest letter only 9
Show this thread -
This is also the landing page of the original article. No evidence here at all that there is the slightest debate about the study or its conclusionspic.twitter.com/S9EdEv5TsM
Show this thread -
It's fair to say that 99%+ of people who have read the study probably assume that there is no scientific issue with it, even though there are several letters pointing out problems ~published in the same journal~
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mud slinging on social media? I got nuthin' else
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I watched the editor of
@BJAJournals talk at the recent#asm2021 admitting that preprints prior to journal peer review is here to stay post-COVID. Is suppose the problem is you still have the choice of avoiding pre publication scrutiny.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.