If I would be the one writing this paper, and I would write this I am guilty first of breaching the scientific ethics. Whatever happens after, I would have to deal with it, as I strike first. It doesn't matter if it is a PhD student or a researcher with h-index of 110. Irrelevant
-
-
Replying to @federicolois
What total garbage. A bad paper does not then justify any and all attacks, nor does it make ad-hominems somehow more scientific. Your argument makes no sense whatsoever
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
There are bad papers, and this class of papers. This is an entirely different category. This is a hit piece disguised behind a methods section, that looks good to the untrained eye. Doesn't fool people that has been doing this for years.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois @GidMK
You engage with a bad paper, explaining what they did wrong. Showing potential new avenues to analyze data, errors in the analysis, hidden biases. How do you engage with a hit piece? I can tell you I don't know. Probably I am too inexperience in mud fights.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois
Let's put it this way - when someone lied about me in public in a paper that similarly lied about my work and was filled with errors, I somehow managed to critique it without doing something like this It is not that hard
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Let's agree to disagree on that first part. I followed the entire drama. Didn't like any side, the before, the after and the after-party. Don't know, as I said, inexperienced in the mud fights. And I disagree on many things with Ioannidis approach too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @federicolois @GidMK
What I would say is this. I have seen this things happening on closed doors at university settings. These fights end up bad for every party involved. Noone wins, because it is blow after blow until everybody is hurt. What changed is now they become public.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @federicolois @GidMK
That's among the reasons why I left academia immediately after graduation. I couldn't stand it. The double standards, the backstabbing, the fiefdoms, the egos, everywhere you look it's dirty.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois
There is indeed a great deal of disgusting behaviour in academia. Often, it happens behind closed doors, but sometimes as in this case it is out in the open. If you don't like it, why are you supporting it
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
I am not supporting it. What I am saying is that it is expected. You said: "You dont like the paper". No, I believe it is borderline misconduct. If you craft a hit-piece, you are on your own, no support from me. That some editor accepted it to CHI 2021 is disgusting me even more.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You're arguing that two wrongs make a right because you dislike the paper. That's very clearly supporting it
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.