Not an answer. You can call for a retraction without belittling PhD students
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
If I would have been named explicitly, sorry but it becomes fair game. There are ethical ways to present information, this one scores a tick in every checkbox of what not to do on that regard. The only way to label it is as a hit-piece, sorry. It is Data Presentation 101.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois
Total red herring. Regardless of the paper's quality, attacking the lead author for being a PhD student is wrong and I cannot believe you'd argue against this very fundamental point of science
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
And no, not PhD student neither seasoned researchers should engage in that behavior. But if they do, they are essentially opening the game to whatever the attack they received. If you strikes first, whatever happens is on you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois
Firstly, that's nonsensical, and secondly they did not do so
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Let's start dissecting everything they do wrong.. You don't report actual people. This is Data Analysis 101. This is 1st class of data ethics (comes even before data visualization techniques).pic.twitter.com/8CdfCrSuKQ
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois @GidMK
In data analysis, you never pick a side. That is blatantly obvious just from the start.pic.twitter.com/HlhbDvbVdH
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @federicolois @GidMK
Do I have to say anything? You already had made your mind, therefore you are using data analysis to cherrypick your point and also misrepresenting a big group of people with some specific stereotype.pic.twitter.com/sY92fy4QaT
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @GidMK
Yes it does. Open your mind. You have suffered it yourself, it is not nice to be standing on this side, where you are personally labelled. I seen (and comprehend) your rants about it. That's a double standard. That you were the small guy, doesn't make it different.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You don't like the paper. Fine. I might even agree! Still fine. But none of this makes attacking the PhD student who is first author ~based on nothing but eminence~ ok. It is unscientific, regardless of the paltry excuses
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.