It’s close to, what isn’t trivial is injecting a drug which isn’t necessary not have any longitudinal data
-
-
-
Obviously many counterarguments to that, but one interesting point - what does the longitudinal data say about COVID-19 infection in children?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
USA Feb-Dec 2020 hospitalisations of 5-17 year olds 141,611 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html … but it doesn’t affect kids...

-
What % had underlying conditions
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The rate of illness in children and the very low number of symptoms in children have left us very misleading and lacking various observational data, including tests.

-
As a result, we overlooked the most fundamental component of this outbreak, the ability to find time to spread before the symptom, and the main reason for its spread, here again in children, and again we were wrong!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
has JB said anything true in the last 15 months?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have the GBD proponents ever discussed any risk associated to COVID-19 that is not just the individual risk of death under best treatment? I'm not just talking about "long COVID". I'm thinking about the risk of overwhelming the system, or of more standard long-term consequences
-
Not that I'm aware of, no
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
may be you can add to your epi rules - the risk is never zero (for anything or is it!?)

-
Lol now I'm trying to think of a risk that really *is* zero. Maybe risk of lower limb fracture in a double amputee?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.