Not surprising it’s getting this attention since they were clearly seeking it.
-
-
-
Just utter garbage. Shame on the authors and on the journal.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They asked people to write a rebuttal. Mines 7 pages long. Here are the core points. Hopefully will be available Monday (on a blog). Sorry this is hard to read.pic.twitter.com/c52khgVvWU
-
this is likely narrative engineering to shift the median.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
BMJ is really out there with their choice of blog posts between this and the terrible post about "suspected COVID-19" in the Pfizer/BioNTech FDA submission
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
BMJ has been a go-to source for antivaxers for years now. They have a serious legitimacy problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The risk of covid in children is greater than for meningitis, and we have a vaccine for that.
-
Which was studied for years before approval.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Only makes sense if children never see their more vulnerable parents or grandparents. I suppose for the BMJ, and a British public school education that wouldn’t be so unusual.
-
The vaccine has effectively stopped hospitalization for vulnerable people or grandparents.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.