"EUA’s should be considered for children at genuinely high risk of serious complications from infection" - based on the evidence, this is true of all children, therefore why argue against EUAs?
-
-
1/n That shouldn't be too difficult. Take a 50% seroprevalence location (my hometown serves quite well), spike based randomized serostudy done less than a month ago. Know the population, 125K inhabitants, 15% percent >60yo. 3 deaths over the entire pandemic below 40yo.pic.twitter.com/pZpGDZ00I5
-
2/n Therefore, that is 60K (rounding down) infected people, and given our population structure we know that at least 30K of those had been below 40yo. Right? So from 30K infections you got 4 deaths.pic.twitter.com/ohLZzLm891
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Leave the kids alone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.