Good point. It is easier to say "He doesn't even go here!" than to repudiate the anti-maskers and COVID minimizers in your midst.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How is this either ironic or not repudiating misinformation?
-
Ironic because you would expect them to refute the misinformation, but the statement is mostly just saying that the guy doesn't work at Stanford. Also they continue to have many faculty members publicly saying that masks don't work i.e.https://twitter.com/GYamey/status/1385049837742272516?s=20 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what about one of their scholars who is not only an anti-masker but someone who isn’t above personally attacking other academics?! Where were Stanford then?!
-
Pretty much. Seems they mostly care about their reputation (not surprising)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just for the record, do you believe masks work at preventing the spread of respiratory diseases?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From what I understand that hypothesis paper is really weak and baseless - but with regards to other incidents I liked Vinay Prasads take on the overuse of the term 'misinformation' - that what you're trying to say is that you disagree but your keyboard is broken.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does stanford still require masks in its hospitals and other medical facilities? if they don’t work, why require them? Would anyone go to a hospital or clinic where doctors and patients weren’t wearing masks? How did HCW covid cases change when they required them?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.