5/n So the piece is wrong about COVID-19. But it also appears to be wrong about masks quite a lot
-
-
P.S. I clicked "like" after actually reading your whole thread and doing some spot checks of your sources.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great thread as always! I actually wrote about this same "study" because Jeffrey Tucker of AIER was whining because Kulldorff was whining about Bhattacharyra. https://twitter.com/LazarusLong13/status/1382756921338331136?s=19 … What I love about that study...it's being used as an example of what to check for in bad /1
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In other words, bad science exists, as does foolishness and misrepresentation. It doesn't take a science Phd to understand the basic principles of mask wearing, particularly aerosol rated masks such as N95. Even a philosophy or poetry Phd should be able to understand!
-
However: It isn't about understanding. Wolff (and others like the GBD folk) are part of an systemic effort, similar to/overlapping with what is described in "Merchants of Doubt"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt … - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@threadreaderapp unroll pls -
Hola, please find the unroll here: Omg I am LOVING this story TL:DR - it is not a study, published in a… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1384005308649918475.html … Enjoy :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why don’t you read the studies done by own military then, comparing transmission rates among barracks, between those ordered to wear vs not wear masks, done just this last year. Transmission rates the same. Consistent with the studies done over the years in surgical suites.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.