Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GidMK's profile
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Verified account
@GidMK

Tweets

Health NerdVerified account

@GidMK

Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Sydney, New South Wales
theguardian.com/profile/gideon…
Joined November 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      5/n So the piece is wrong about COVID-19. But it also appears to be wrong about masks quite a lot

      1 reply 2 retweets 53 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      6/n For example, here's a paragraph where it is simply assumed that facemasks cause chronic hypoxemia/hypercapnia. The four references are 3 physiology textbooks and another review piecepic.twitter.com/g08YcWwuRA

      2 replies 2 retweets 59 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      7/n The WHO document referenced here was updated December 2020 and now completely contradicts both this assertion and indeed the entire paperpic.twitter.com/34kpeqBKzr

      1 reply 0 retweets 61 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      8/n So, I think it's fair to say that this opinion piece probably doesn't represent either a scientific study or even really evidence per se, and it gets a lot wrong about both masks and COVID-19 How did it get published?

      1 reply 4 retweets 61 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      9/n Well, the journal itself gives us a hint The description alone of Medical Hypotheses is pretty interesting stuffpic.twitter.com/VtaKiEWHii

      1 reply 4 retweets 65 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      10/n Reading some previous work published by the paper gives you an idea of what kind of "novel, radical" ideas which "would be rejected" elsewhere they sometimes put outpic.twitter.com/kPWt8bV0hN

      2 replies 0 retweets 58 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      11/n (In the journal's defense, they do also put out lots of less fringe hypotheses, they appear to take seriously the idea of giving everyone's ideas a forum for discussion)

      1 reply 0 retweets 42 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      12/n As to the Stanford connection? Well, the author appears to be a physical therapist at a hospital near Stanford that has an affiliation for teaching purposes with the universitypic.twitter.com/XentFPtpUH

      6 replies 0 retweets 51 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      13/n We can split hairs, but I'm not sure this qualifies as saying that the study is produced by Stanford

      1 reply 0 retweets 55 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      14/n Anyway, regardless of what you think about masks, the paper has numerous errors and is probably not a useful resource for determining whether to use them or not

      5 replies 2 retweets 76 likes
      Show this thread
      Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Apr 18

      15/n None of this has stopped anyone citing the "study" as evidence of anything, of course, because no one checks the facts of things they agree with!

      10:20 PM - 18 Apr 2021
      • 5 Retweets
      • 106 Likes
      • Eric Feigl-Ding 1984 Frankito Sapiente Aya Amurjuev Noel O Connor🐄🐑 Swaledale Mutton Co. Elaine Perrigot 🇪🇺💉💉 Proud European from Austria🇪🇺🇦🇹 🌏 Jarrod McMaugh MPS
      5 replies 5 retweets 106 likes
        1. Alex Anderson‏ @bucciarolo Apr 19
          Replying to @GidMK

          P.S. I clicked "like" after actually reading your whole thread and doing some spot checks of your sources.

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Lazarus Long‏ @LazarusLong13 Apr 19
          Replying to @GidMK

          Lazarus Long Retweeted Lazarus Long

          Great thread as always! I actually wrote about this same "study" because Jeffrey Tucker of AIER was whining because Kulldorff was whining about Bhattacharyra. https://twitter.com/LazarusLong13/status/1382756921338331136?s=19 … What I love about that study...it's being used as an example of what to check for in bad /1

          Lazarus Long added,

          Lazarus Long @LazarusLong13
          Dr. Yamey nailed his analysis. Now, let's follow the circle of life: 1. Bhattacharyra whines. 2. Kulldorff runs with his whining to the WSJ Op-Ed page . 3. AIER's Tucker Carlson wanna-be @jeffreyatucker picks it up, and writes an incredibly long AND wrong piece on it that https://twitter.com/GYamey/status/1382447414435516416 …
          Show this thread
          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
        3. Lazarus Long‏ @LazarusLong13 Apr 19
          Replying to @LazarusLong13 @GidMK

          research, already. https://www.amgenbiotechexperience.com/seeing-not-necessarily-believing …pic.twitter.com/O4gq6zO3z9

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Critic‏ @bender2440 Apr 19
          Replying to @GidMK

          In other words, bad science exists, as does foolishness and misrepresentation. It doesn't take a science Phd to understand the basic principles of mask wearing, particularly aerosol rated masks such as N95. Even a philosophy or poetry Phd should be able to understand!

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Proud European from Austria 🇪🇺 🇦🇹  🌏‏ @e2dot7182818284 Apr 19
          Replying to @bender2440 @GidMK

          However: It isn't about understanding. Wolff (and others like the GBD folk) are part of an systemic effort, similar to/overlapping with what is described in "Merchants of Doubt"👇https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt …

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Birgit Beinsen‏ @bb_Graz Apr 19
          Replying to @GidMK

          @threadreaderapp unroll pls

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Thread Reader Unroll Helper‏ @UnrollHelper Apr 19
          Replying to @bb_Graz

          Hola, please find the unroll here: Omg I am LOVING this story TL:DR - it is not a study, published in a… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1384005308649918475.html … Enjoy :) 🤖

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Garrett Sullivan‏ @gsullivanMD Apr 22
          Replying to @GidMK

          Why don’t you read the studies done by own military then, comparing transmission rates among barracks, between those ordered to wear vs not wear masks, done just this last year. Transmission rates the same. Consistent with the studies done over the years in surgical suites.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Garrett Sullivan‏ @gsullivanMD Apr 23
          Replying to @gsullivanMD @GidMK

          https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717 …

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info