2/n The article in question is a review of face masks. At face value, it's essentially an opinion piece arguing that masks are ineffective https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/#b0010 …pic.twitter.com/SljSy4RJCK
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
13/n We can split hairs, but I'm not sure this qualifies as saying that the study is produced by Stanford
14/n Anyway, regardless of what you think about masks, the paper has numerous errors and is probably not a useful resource for determining whether to use them or not
15/n None of this has stopped anyone citing the "study" as evidence of anything, of course, because no one checks the facts of things they agree with!
So like Westmead Hospital and Sydney Uni?
Healthcare systems in the US are often wildly complex, but I think a similar idea
At the VA? Has nothing to do with Stanford.
According to the VA website they've got some affiliation with Stanford, although they don't say how muchhttps://www.paloalto.va.gov/about/
Oddly, his LinkedIn profile doesn’t even list where he works.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.