The samples are: 1. Blood donor study 2. Single hospital study 3. Single hospital study 4. Massive, random, province/city-wide studypic.twitter.com/Y11cAz0cJV
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Apologies! Another sample has been recently published that I was not aware of. This is also a random citywide estimate that implies an IFR of 0.5% So a reasonable range might be 0.5-0.8% for the IFR of Wuhanhttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00238-5/fulltext …
The tone of his original comments just reeked of offense and peeve that someone he considers an inferior was daring to question his work. You don't even need to be capable of following the technical arguments to get that. 1/
And given his career-long rallying against Eminence-Based Medicine, it's entirely hypocritical, and significantly undermines confidence that his own work on this is unbiased. It's so disappointing, I really held him in high regard before COVID. 2/2
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.