While there are many areas in which we disagree, I think the biggest error remains including studies that are clearly inappropriate to determine population estimates of infection rates
-
-
All 3 estimates of the IFR that use biased sampling and survey methodology are half the more rigorous data. This inclusion of inappropriate estimates is repeated numerous times in the IFR review
@AtomsksSanakan covered this in detailhttps://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1341183815176364038?s=20 …
Show this thread -
Anyway, I always think it's quite telling when people choose to attack the qualifications of their critics rather than discussing the critique itself
Show this thread -
Apologies! Another sample has been recently published that I was not aware of. This is also a random citywide estimate that implies an IFR of 0.5% So a reasonable range might be 0.5-0.8% for the IFR of Wuhanhttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00238-5/fulltext …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.