This seems weaselly to me.
If lengthy material can simply disappear between posting and being designated VOR, it's not properly citable—so why is it posted at all?
@wileyinresearch needs to 1) acknowledge changes to and 2) preserve an archival copy of it gives a DOI. Period.https://twitter.com/wileyinresearch/status/1381614597896032257 …
-
-
That’s it, NFTs coming soon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah except that's NOT the notice that
@wileyinresearch put. You said it was fully peer reviewed and that differences may arise from "copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading". Changing the actual content is not ok. See pic. (Yes I screenshotted html version too)pic.twitter.com/gBt6UCcGRG
-
Kyle, I just want to say that your record keeping has been super impressive.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.