
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't, by any chance, own a cat?
-
Cue 6-week discussion on the householder-cat relationship and dependencies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder which distinguished scientist said that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t even know what to make of it. The part of me that only wants to see good in people wants to look sympathetically at the author note. The part of me that is angry is still pretty angry. The two sides are equal. At least he acknowledged a personal attack is upsetting
-
My 2 cents is you have every damn right to be angry, and remember that as terrible as you have been treated, you did what was right. You were ethical, honest and intellectually sound. Your detractors bared themselves before the whole scientific community
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is incredibly depressing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And he concedes that they should be moved to other fora besides academic journals if they happen. Such as........ Twitter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like when I try to make you angry that a ScienceMag journalist smeared Swedish researcher Ludvigsson cause his research "downplayed covid"? Nah. Different thing, right? Not interesting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Any public discussion that adds to my position: NEEDED AND IMPORTANT DEBATE 