The first large, well-done RCT on ivermectin for mild COVID-19 has been published, and has found no benefit for the drug https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777389 …pic.twitter.com/tCNpFrLHss
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Ok, that thread is amazingly bizarre. Completely ignores confidence intervals or any statistical tests because of some vague accusations of bias on the part of the authors, then just cherry picks the few results that were (non-significantly) better in the ivm arm
For all of us who must admit not to have read the paper, could you confirm or reject some of the many claims about error sources that (supposedly) favor negative/neutral/non-significant results?
That anonymous account started off as a HCQ proponent at a time when it was already clear there was no evidence of its efficacy. Has also retweeted rubbish from pseudoscienctific sources such as Swiss policy research and the likes.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.