Imagine if scientists had spent the last 12 months discussing actual problems instead of having to combat total bullshit for most of the pandemic instead
-
-
whuts with this? All the questionable doctor/profs that employed at Stanford -- Ioannidis, Bhattacharya, Trump's Scott Atlas. Another Prasad is at USF. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard advising the UK badly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s been an exhausting year that could have been far more productive!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I totally agree. But---as a scientist myself---science has made some serious, major missteps during all of this that didn't help you at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I vaguely remember epidemiologists spending a lot of time arguing BLM protests were more important than Covid-19 interventions...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The anti-science, pro mumbo jumbo tolerance is technical debt that we've been carrying around for decades. It's been sabotaging climate change action and now COVID response. I really think this is a fight we need to have, even if it seems sisyphean at the time.
-
Until they have guys who'll be like "hey homies! If you vote me I'll write the idiocy you came up with to comfort yourself into law", that's gonna be pretty hard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Actually if we allowed unchecked spread the deaths would stay the same as with a lockdown!"
-
One secret trick pandemics hate!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh man. I seem to remember trying to start conversations of that kind around the time I got to know you.
-
Nearly a year and yet we're still having the same dumb conversations Sigh
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
