(One could argue that there is a specific moral component to, say, meat, but given that there are vegan alternatives to most foods that would be quite clearly missing the point)
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's no moral component to, say, eating animals? Really?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cracking open an Easter Egg right now in response to this Tweet!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chocolate from Nestle and many others is made using slave labour. I'd say that's a moral component? Also vegans would probably disagree, too. And consuming resources in general is an ethical question... :P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get what you're trying to say and I agree that people should not made to feel guilty. But at the same time I think the existence of slave labour, environmental impacts and the ethics of eating animal products under capitalism are important moral considerations in my opinion
-
You could almost word it precisely the converse, *all* food has a moral component related to the ethics, environmental impact, social impact of it's production.. (not sure what capitalism has to do with it, a battery hen is still a battery hen in the USSR!)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Palm oil
Brazilian beef ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Am I the only person wondering if “live” is a necessary adjective? (

) -
That's the "specific" part of "specific moral component." :D
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
