Something I think about a lot is that studies don't get retracted because they're bad, they get retracted because they are famous
-
-
You are preaching to the converted. It may be inevitable: https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/the-end-of-an-error-peer-review/ … Alternatively, maybe we (as a community) should do more to discourage crap work. TBH, the "list your best n papers" has already been a start.
-
While writing on PubPeer will be very helpful to flag possible concerns, when there are several interconnected insignificant or "bad" papers that support a single narrative, would it also be helpful to write a formal review bringing all of the data together?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.