Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GidMK's profile
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Verified account
@GidMK

Tweets

Health NerdVerified account

@GidMK

Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Sydney, New South Wales
theguardian.com/profile/gideon…
Joined November 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Carl T. Bergstrom‏Verified account @CT_Bergstrom Mar 8

      Imagine being surprised that academics who volunteer their time as social media fact checkers are often active on social media. Next thing you know, we'll find that the people who peer review journal articles often publish in those same journals.pic.twitter.com/gT5dxnWeFA

      24 replies 65 retweets 599 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷‏Verified account @VPrasadMDMPH Mar 8
      Replying to @CT_Bergstrom

      Why don't you read the article, Carl 👇👇 the SAME fact checker website did not use twitter stars to fact check articles PRE-covid https://www.medpagetoday.com/blogs/vinay-prasad/91526 …pic.twitter.com/jkrHEzVeq8

      6 replies 2 retweets 40 likes
    3. Carl T. Bergstrom‏Verified account @CT_Bergstrom Mar 8
      Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH

      Given your expertise in causal inference, you can probably figure out that the data aren't sufficient to suggest that twitter prominence leads to selection as a COVID fact-checker. Perhaps, e.g., during a massive pandemic, COVID expertise leads to both.

      3 replies 9 retweets 98 likes
    4. Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷‏Verified account @VPrasadMDMPH Mar 8
      Replying to @CT_Bergstrom

      1. Stop deleting what you are saying when I'm trying to reply 2. Their twitter use is WAY higher than avg. faculty in Epi at Hopkins 3. haha, come on, don't defend this as impartial 'fact checking' here is a link so folks can decide https://www.medpagetoday.com/blogs/vinay-prasad/91526 …pic.twitter.com/Y1qjanxsfr

      3 replies 1 retweet 23 likes
    5. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Mar 8
      Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @CT_Bergstrom

      My favorite part of this is that we can actually do a fairly basic empirical test of whether the idea that twitter royalty is required to be a FB fact-checker is true, or whether it's simply a correlation due to pandemic expertise by looking at pre-pandemic follower counts

      2 replies 4 retweets 57 likes
    6. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Mar 8
      Replying to @GidMK @VPrasadMDMPH @CT_Bergstrom

      Of the people quoted for the healthfeedback piece, the median number of twitter followers was 4,514, with two people having well below 1,000 prior to COVID-19. The mean is skewed up to 35k by Topol

      2 replies 3 retweets 34 likes
    7. Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷‏Verified account @VPrasadMDMPH Mar 8
      Replying to @GidMK @CT_Bergstrom

      Wrong, Topol is not an expert in the dataset-- he was never a reviewer, his tweet was just quoted in the 'independent fact checking website' that obviosly appropriately selects what articles to review and rate. 🤣🤣🤣 Gideon, you are the king of motivated reasoning, it appears.

      1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
    8. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Mar 8
      Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @CT_Bergstrom

      Oh, the number is MUCH lower if you only look at reviewers. Of the three reviewers for the piece, Tara had a fairly large account prior to COVID-19, Bill had a tiny one, and I do not believe Marm had one at all

      1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
    9. Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷‏Verified account @VPrasadMDMPH Mar 8
      Replying to @GidMK @CT_Bergstrom

      Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷 Retweeted Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷

      https://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/status/1369141032152014848?s=20 …

      Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷 added,

      Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷Verified account @VPrasadMDMPH
      Replying to @GidMK @CT_Bergstrom
      Sadly that is not the sole claim in the article nor the appropriate test. If you pick fact checkers from folks who have telegraphed their opinion on issues (via twitter), one does not have an independent process. end of story.
      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK Mar 8
      Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @CT_Bergstrom

      I was responding to a factual claim with an empirical test. I think it's quite useful to know if the statement is true or not irrespective of whether our opinions align

      8:27 PM - 8 Mar 2021
      • 1 Retweet
      • 5 Likes
      • Dr. Angela Rasmussen Lonni Besançon 🇫🇷 🇸🇪 Boback Ziaeian 🤦🏻‍♂️ Dan Freedman, DO Carl T. Bergstrom Alex Kaufman
      1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Vinay Prasad, MD MPH  🎙️ 📷‏Verified account @VPrasadMDMPH Mar 8
          Replying to @GidMK @CT_Bergstrom

          ur q makes no sense; I've 0 doubt these folks had low followers pre-covid. They have high followers now b/c they have a shared world view, and broadcast that daily, and hence are chosen as reviewers when you could choose rando faculty at hopkins but couldn't guess their 2 c

          2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
        3. Zach Hensel‏ @alchemytoday Mar 8
          Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH @GidMK @CT_Bergstrom

          Or they've accumulated followers because they've proven to provide useful information on the topic over the last year and were chosen as reviewers for the same reason.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info