This is a strange take by @VPrasadMDMPH. The WSJ article claiming we'd have herd immunity by April was NOT "a free exchange of ideas". It was a BS propaganda piece masquerading as an idea, based on factually false claims. Glad to have contributed to this w/ @aetiology @BillHanagehttps://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/status/1368271129639481346 …
-
-
Ammazza oh, come il prezzemolo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would have commented on that tweet, but it turns out he’s blocked me. Oh well, I certainly don’t feel I’m missing out on anything worthwhile..

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So criticising an article, which an external organisation then uses to make a decision, is not a ‘free exchange of ideas’ but is actually ‘cancel culture’. Wtf.
-
By that logic the original article is cancel culture too as it’s saying epi’s, public health depts etc shouldn’t be listened to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Facebook has now thrice censored university professors w/ content expertise discussing their view of sars-cov 2
We are permitting a monopolistic company to hire third parties to restrict free exchange of scientific ideas
(some thoughts - thread)