I understand your point that there are far worse examples of data manipulation, but I don't think that is a reason to downplay what seems to have happened here. Publishing a big claim while hiding data that may contradict it, even if you think it doesn't, is serious. No?
-
-
This is all true, I think there are still a couple things that need to be considered though. First, the emails, which clearly show the author was aware of the potential implications of this data.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
I would add that it is understandable that people would leap to deceptive explanations after the author burned all scientific credibility to the ground with the Great Barrington Declaration
-
More than that. In one ethics request he asked for rapid approval because the study was needed for people making policy decisions. He reconfirmed this approach again in a Newsweek article today (which completely ignores the actual allegations)https://www.newsweek.com/swedish-professor-who-quit-covid-research-over-backlash-stands-school-studys-findings-1573452 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
