The article is published, and it includes mortality data comparing Mar-Jun 2020 to Nov-Feb 2019, which makes no sense at all. There's no significant difference. Zero mention of the concerning year on year comparison at all. >
-
-
Yes, but in this instance he claims to have been told to use another analysis As far as we know the reviewer for NEJM have seen both analysis
-
If you sent in a paper to a journal with several different analysis using different comparisons where they all come to more or less the same conclusion and you were then asked to exclude some of them Are you as the researcher then p-hacking if you agree to that?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.