Yes it is rather remarkable the lengths people are going to misinterpret what you said. Impressive intellectual dishonesty
-
-
Moreover, you've spent quite some time calling for more civil discourse over the last year, which brings me back to my original question - is this episode representative of academic civility?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your answer is a classic false equivalence & red herring. So if I am against anal swab, I am for blood draws? How about none for kids unless *really* demonstrated benefits/rationale? Not a study from China showed a not significant diff. Not the case in the paper in question.
-
The context is a research study in children to calculate population prevalence, so unless you're suggesting a purely questionnaire-based assessment of prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 there has to be ~some~ intervention
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.