There's been a lot of discussion recently about preprints and how we should interpret them as evidence A few thoughts from my perspective as an epidemiologist and science communicator 1/7
-
-
7/7 For science journalists, while it's important to note that a study is a preprint, I would otherwise approach it exactly as you would any other study
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I doubt there is such a correlation. There are too many to count examples of very bad science published in reputable journals too. That alone evens out the sample, though medical journals aren't alone on that one. Reproduction rate is bad in most fields.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.