I don’t even understand why there was fuss about this paper. I’m a non-ID biostat’n and I’ve been following this conversation so I’m surprised to be surprised. What is she claiming or recommending here that is objectionable enough to warrant this? What am I missing?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But this is deeply strange. My instinct as an academic is that people taking extreme stances on anything of this nature are ill-informed. I can’t be alone in this, so silenvih seems a super weird move strategically, unless I’m missing something.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I am finding this terrifying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I prefer the open discussion/criticizing of papers on Twitter....at least it gives a person a chance to reflect, respond and/or retract.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is that the one where she suggests anal swabbing the kids?
-
Maybe I'm missing something, but how is it different from, say, taking the temperature anally?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
quietly trying to get someone fired
politely noting these events on social media
I think you all know what to do.
Share the paper far and wide.