the CDC school guidance convo is a lot. Those who overstated "the science” for months are frustrated that the new guidelines don't really endorse what they thought was basically fact. And it seems to be dawning on others that there's good-faith debate among experts re: standards?
-
-
we also see the tensions playing out with the vaccine conversation. If it’s true teachers are not at risk, why prioritize them? If they are at higher risk, why cast their demands for vaccination first as “anti-science”? No one wants to say, yes we’re asking you to bear some risk
-
Pretty much. Problem is once you've taken a fixed position like "schools are safe" it's hard to backtrack to a reasonable statement like "we're not entirely sure that schools are safe but we think on balance it's worth the risk"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.