So much of bad science comes down to dressing up a study as something it's not. It's absolutely fine to do an observational study. But to call it a "randomised controlled trial", then deny that you ever said that, *despite it being explicitly written in your paper* is baffling.https://twitter.com/NoahHaber/status/1361377651999580163 …
-
-
I think the authors don't actually understand the purpose of randomization in the context of a clinical trial, or at least that's what the pubpeer comment implies
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
