A little behind on my @Plenary_Session podcasts.
@VPrasadMDMPH with a very good (thorough) conversation with John P.A. Ioannidis @Stanford. A "deep dive into his work from 2000 all the way up to present day."
And yes, the #COVID19Pandemic is discussed.https://soundcloud.com/plenarysession/ep341 …
-
-
Replying to @chrishendel @Plenary_Session and
Should I listen? Or is it just softball questions with no follow up when JI engages in revisionist history about his poor predictions as I have seen him do in other interviews?
1 reply 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @chrishendel and
I'm not sure what constitutes softball questions or no follow up, but I finally listened to the podcast and I count half a dozen+ factual inaccuracies including several points at which Prof Ioannidis directly contradicts his own public statements and none of this is addressed
2 replies 2 retweets 17 likes
One example: at 45:25 Prof Ioanndis says: "Was the [Santa Clara study] the best study?....of course not" He is quoted in the NYT from April 21st, 2020: "It’s not perfect, but it’s the best science can do"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.