Hi @liammannix do you have link to the "10 RCTs showing 63 percent protection against COVID 19" in your paper this afternoon?
https://www.theage.com.au/national/i-m-the-virus-expert-cited-by-mp-craig-kelly-vaccines-are-critical-but-he-s-not-all-wrong-20210204-p56zfc.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Kyle Sheldrick Retweeted Kyle Sheldrick
This claim needs to be taken with a pinch of salt. The 63% level of protection in the original article this is largely self-plagiarised from gave the calculation as "1 - O.R. = protection" which is very wrong.https://twitter.com/K_Sheldrick/status/1356918554352787456 …
Kyle Sheldrick added,
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @K_Sheldrick
I'm also pretty sure it's entirely wrong, given that the few high-quality studies on HCQ have all been null
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
Kyle Sheldrick Retweeted Kyle Sheldrick
I really hope it's not the MA that Craig Kelly has been spruiking because that one has... issues.https://twitter.com/K_Sheldrick/status/1356945910740054019 …
Kyle Sheldrick added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There are two awful analyses that are usually cited, but without any referencing or basic fact-checking by @theage I guess we'll never know
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.