No, it's not possible that the paper has "literally killed people." How has this ridiculous claim become the de facto response to everything Twitter "public health experts" disagree with?https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1356085721744855046 …
Nope, that's exactly what I meant, that it is possible that due to the errors that the authors agree they made that people may have died. No accusations of murder, no wild nonsense, merely a statement of fact
-
-
You claim they killed people in an unprovable probabilistic assertion that you also call a "fact" which, though it can be literally* true [that you said it]... is also tripe on its face. People killing other people is murder. *using "literally" literally here, unlike how you do
-
I never said the authors personally killed anyone. You're just talking bullshit, cheerio
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.