Editors behaving badly (very badly indeed).
Assuming this is true, @SpringerNature should be firing an editor some time tomorrow.https://twitter.com/amybarnhorst/status/1353826621375926272 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @BorisBarbour @SpringerNature
They won't, tho. My guess: after a bunch of attention, they quietly retract the paper with no official explanation and never speak of this again
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @SpringerNature
Again, if the allegation stands up, the editor(s) should be fired out of a cannon. Also for being a complete idiot - sending the authors the paper! I'm wondering which was actually published first. Did the editor publish while holding up the original?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GidMK @SpringerNature
Pessimistic today? Have some faith in Springer-Nature...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BorisBarbour @SpringerNature
After the total failures of
@JAMANetworkOpen I'm pessimistic about these things tbh1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
See also 40k papers on PubPeer. Yet, publishers hate a Twitter pile-on. And no calculation required to evaluate this one.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Twitter is "divisive" and "inappropriate" but leaving clear mistakes and fraud up in journals without comment is the height of professionalism!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.