15/n I mean, using a paper that says "there is no relationship between missed schooling and mortality" to support your argument that there is a relationship between schooling and mortality is...something
-
-
26/n This was after
@ikashnitsky and I pointed out that the paper was MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE Quite a worrying way to respondShow this thread -
27/n After we published our preprint critique, and it was reported on in the Guardian, we were told to submit a comment on the piece as soon as possible online and they'd get back to ushttps://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/dec/08/coronavirus-study-that-found-us-school-closures-cut-life-expectancy-criticised-by-epidemiologist …
Show this thread -
28/n Two months after the initial emails, and over a month after we submitted the comment, we have this correction published Unfortunately, the study has already had an enormous impact, and changed lives across the world
Show this thread -
29/n You will probably be interested
@stephaniemlee@MelissaLDavey@apsmunro@DrZoeHyde@devisridhar@DFismanShow this thread -
30/n Overall, what we have is a paper where the mathematically impossible results have been removed, but is still flawed in numerous ways and useless as evidence for decision-making
Show this thread -
31/n The sad fact is that the approach the authors took, if implemented correctly, probably would not have found that school closures cost more YLL than COVID-19
Show this thread -
32/n This DOESN'T MEAN that school closures are a good thing, necessarily, but YLL is a measure inherently geared towards measuring people who have already died, and it's just not likely that closing schools has cost so much of this metric
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.