Australia, New Zealand, the UK (guidance not law), Germany, etc etc etc. Perhaps better to ask why many places in the US aren't even doing the basic protection measures that most of the world has adopted this late in the pandemic
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PhilWMagness
What an oddly US-centric thing to say. The United States makes up what, 4% of the world's population? and even within the US many places ARE doing these things
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PhilWMagness
Maybe the US would not be in such a bad situation if they had followed the global gold standard set by remote Pacific Islands such as the state of New South Wales, population 7.8 million
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PhilWMagness
That's broadly untrue. Australia actually started closing borders AFTER the US during the initial wave, despite a large volume of traffic to/from Wuhan
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PhilWMagness
Interesting. So, what you're saying is that per capita Australia has 2-3x the volume of international travel? I would also add that we were at higher risk due to physical proximity to China and trade arrangements
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Well, you'd expect us to import more cases per capita and thus have greater seeding in Australia given the information you've presented. Quite impressive for such a remote Pacific Island (that is bigger than Texas+Alaska combined)!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.