15/n Next, we have this sentence that is probably the most contentious one in the document The rest of the paragraph is obvious fact, but were lockdowns "essential"?pic.twitter.com/khOVGaKYa0
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
26/n So, we're at the end. There are no factual inaccuracies per se in the JSM that I could find, and the references all support the statements
27/n There are definitely two statements that are arguable, although I personally think that they are reasonable to say. Realistically, the difference between "essential" and "useful/necessary" is more semantic than scientific
28/n I would say that the JSM is basically a scientific document with a call to action in it In contrast, as I've explained before, the GBD is simply an unscientific piece of political propaganda
29/n Comparing the two is an interesting exercise, because even at face value they are amazingly different. GBD does not cite any evidence, and the only specific statement it makes about science (re: herd immunity) is wrong
30/n In contrast, JSM is filled with factual, scientific statements that are referenced so you can check for yourself
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.