For those people commenting "but what about Ct counts?" I suggest you read this articlehttps://virologydownunder.com/the-false-positive-pcr-problem-is-not-a-problem/ …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Source? Go to
@nswhealth and do some adding
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I afraid that, similarly to the (ab)use of the word "lockdown", people are calling "false-positive tests" many different things, including the case where one has been infected in the past but it is not infectious anymore
-
I also love how people who had no experience with PCR pre-pandemic think they’re experts now and arrogantly lecture those of us who’ve done thousands upon thousands of PCR reactions on Ct thresholds.

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They’ll just chalk it up to more government lies. I know several that still believe there are no excess deaths in US and the CDC numbers are all lies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought the current ‘conspiracy’ (seemingly by out-of-staters) is a mention on the NSW Health site that the testing capacity is 15,000 per day, and hence the last two days of large testing were only swabs taken, and not actually tests... Conspiracy theorists clutching...
-
That’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s a real question. IF the impressive number of tests being taken exceed the capacity to process then there is a backlog, with more (potential) +ve cases yet to show up in the count. People are nervous, looking for answers.
#itsnotaconspiracy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I love quoting these kind of figures to those who throw about 'PCR is a bad test because at least 90% of positives are false'

mmmmmhhhmmmThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would we have to add the potential aundetected false negatives to the true number of infections?
-
A point I’ve been making to the casedemicists ... that even if there are false positives, they’re likely smaller than the false negatives, and false negatives are more “costly” than false positives. It’s the inherent trade off in any test.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.