This is even more true when you realise that even the worst papers only get retracted due to media noisehttps://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1341042196733161474 …
-
-
And sometimes journals such as JCEH will show remarkable alacrity in retracting a scientifically sound article when the lawyers representing powerful companies such as Herbalife call and ‘request’ it.https://twitter.com/microbiomdigest/status/1340800770908725248?s=21 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've been thinking about this, and I think the pressure has to come from the funders. Investigators need shiny things to get into top journals. Journals need shiny things to sell ads. It'll be hard to get them to self-police. But this should shame NIH, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And before I actually tried I had no idea *how* much time these tasks eat, it's a real rabbit hole.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Absolutely. Bad papers rarely/never result in cancelled subscriptions from libraries or researchers
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
