As an epidemiologist who curates an account about absolute and relative risk @justsaysrisks, I do indeed understand the intricacies here. The hilarity comes mostly from you misrepresenting relative risk as some kind of evil plothttps://twitter.com/ClarkeMicah/status/1340068351142490113 …
-
-
Why is it flawed?
-
Because you're ignoring the purpose of the research. You're looking at whether masks reduce your relative rate of non-infection, which is a weird double-negative thing to do
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.